{
    "type": "FeatureCollection",
    "name": "artefact",
    "crs": {
        "type": "name",
        "properties": {
            "name": "EPSG:4326"
        }
    },
    "features": [
        {
            "type": "Feature",
            "geometry": {
                "type": "Point",
                "coordinates": [
                    0,
                    0
                ]
            },
            "properties": {
                "id": 1692,
                "artefact_uri": "https:\/\/4care-skos.mf.no\/artefact\/1692",
                "site_id": 0,
                "site_uri": "https:\/\/4care-skos.mf.no\/place\/",
                "site_name": null,
                "clm_id": "TM 62045",
                "material": "Parchment",
                "description": "Small fragment containing Psalm 30:14-18&nbsp;Broken off on both the left and right side, the vellum fragment shows the middle part of 8 lines, with only roughly a letter missing at the beginning of each. Line 8 reads &alpha;&iota;&sigma;&chi;&upsilon;&nu;&theta;&epsilon;\u03af&eta;&nu; instead of &kappa;&alpha;&tau;&alpha;&iota;&sigma;&chi;&upsilon;&nu;&theta;&epsilon;\u03af&eta;&nu; or &kappa;&alpha;&tau;&epsilon;&sigma;&chi;\u03cd&nu;&theta;&epsilon;&iota;&eta;&nu;. Pattie notes variants in lines 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7, including the omission of &kappa;&alpha;&iota; &epsilon;&kappa; &tau;&omega;&nu; &kappa;&alpha;&tau;&alpha;&delta;&iota;&omega;&kappa;&omicron;&nu;&tau;&omega;&nu; &mu;&epsilon; from verse 16, which would sit between lines 5 and 6.While Pattie considers that the omitted verse part may indicate the use as an amulet, Rahlfs disagrees due to the good orthography and the seemingly random demarcation of the selected verses, which point towards a complete sheet having contained a longer text passage. Furthermore, Rahlfs illustrates that the fragment follows the (originally Sahidic Coptic) Upper Egyptian text version of the Book of Psalms (preserved in Greek by only two documents on papyrus, P.Lips. Inv. 39 [Rahlfs Siglum 2013, 4th c.] and British Library P. 37 [Rahlfs Siglum U, 7th c.]). This would also explain the (according to Pattie 1988) &ldquo;missing&rdquo; part of verse 16, which would not have had its own line, but instead would have been part of the previous line 5. Nomina sacra with supralinear stroke: &kappa;&epsilon;, &theta;&sigma;. Verso blank (?).",
                "date_from": 300,
                "date_to": 499,
                "dating_criteria": "Palaeography (?)",
                "selection_criteria": "Literary genre (Biblical),Nomina sacra",
                "absolute_relative_date": null,
                "stratigraphic_context": "",
                "shelf_mark": "",
                "bibliography": "",
                "external_links": [
                    {
                        "text": "TM 62045 \/ LDAB 3204",
                        "url": "https:\/\/www.trismegistos.org\/text\/62045"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": "DCLP (PN)",
                        "url": "https:\/\/papyri.info\/dclp\/62045"
                    }
                ],
                "classes": "Textual",
                "writing_medium": "Sheet\/roll",
                "text_content": "Literary",
                "language": "Greek",
                "archive": "",
                "authors": [
                    {
                        "author": "Victoria G. D. Landau",
                        "year": "2023"
                    }
                ]
            }
        }
    ]
}