{
    "type": "FeatureCollection",
    "name": "artefact",
    "crs": {
        "type": "name",
        "properties": {
            "name": "EPSG:4326"
        }
    },
    "features": [
        {
            "type": "Feature",
            "geometry": {
                "type": "Point",
                "coordinates": [
                    0,
                    0
                ]
            },
            "properties": {
                "id": 567,
                "artefact_uri": "https:\/\/4care-skos.mf.no\/artefact\/567",
                "site_id": 0,
                "site_uri": "https:\/\/4care-skos.mf.no\/place\/",
                "site_name": null,
                "clm_id": "TM 61966",
                "material": "Papyrus",
                "description": "Codex Freer Greek MS. V; Rahlfs WI; KV9;\u00a0\r\n34 folios from a papyrus codex containing the Minor Prophets with Coptic glosses.\r\nThe codex is formatted in single quires, with one column per page. The quality of the papyrus is described as fine and thin, and appears to connect the texts of the Minor Prophets and the unknown text on prophesy; see ed. pr.\/Sanders. The number of lines per column ranges between 46 and 49 lines of text. The original size is estimated to have been 14 x 32 cm and the original expanse of the codex is suggested to have been 48 folios, of which 34 survived: Although no pagination is evident, the codex appears to have lost the 6 first folios as well as the 8 last folios already in antiquity; see ed. pr.\/Choat.\r\nThe codex contains the works of the Minor Prophets. The identified texts belong to Hosea, Amos, Joel, Abdia, Jonas, Nahum, Habakuk, Sophonias, Aggeus, Zacharias, and Malachias. The large segment belonging to the Dodekapropheton is followed by an unidentified text on prophecy, which was probably a later addition and was copied onto the blank pages in the end of the codex; see ed. pr.\r\nThe Coptic glosses (single words or short phrases) were written in the Sahidic dialect, which does not suit the proposed provenance of the Fayum. From this, the ed.pr.\/Choat suggests that the provenance should remain described as \"unknown\".\r\nThe codex was the earliest Greek manuscript of the Minor Prophets known before the discovery of the Qumran scrolls; see\u00a0ed. pr.\/Sanders.\r\nThe scribe that produced the copy of the Minor prophets was apparently experienced: his hand is a professional majuscule with sometimes cursive tendencies, and was assumed to belong in the end of the 3rd century by the ed. pr.\/Sanders.\u00a0 There is also a second hand (1st corrector; possibly contemporary) and a 3rd hand (2nd corrector; a later addition), and possibly several later annotators (a fourth or even more hands of a later date). The first corrector, initially named a professional diorthotes (see\u00a0the\u00a0ed.\u00a0pr.\/Sanders) is later recognized as the first owner of the manuscript who has made 274 meticulous (and probably contemporaneous) corrections to the manuscript; see ed. pr.\/Choat.\r\nThe hand of the unidentified prophetic text is an informal, rightleaning majuscule, which can be blaced in the early 4th c. There are no accents or breathings, but some instances of diaereses.\u00a0The text contains several\u00a0nomina sacra.\r\nThe unidentified text probably comprised pages 79\u201380 of the original codex, conjoined to pages 17\/18 of the original codex containing Amos 4:1\u20135:15. The text includes inter alia a verbatim quote from Isa 54:12\u201315, citation from Ezek 40:2ff (possibly in the form of Symmachus) and perhaps also an indirect reference to Rev 21. The text was initially suggested to be a lost work on prophecy by Clement of Alexandria (or perhaps Origenes) (see Thackerey 1929), but the arguments for this has since been opposed and the ed. pr.\/Choat presents the identification of the text as still quite uncertain.",
                "date_from": 250,
                "date_to": 399,
                "dating_criteria": "Palaeography. Dated to the second half of the 3rd c. by the ed. pr.\u00a0(Sanders), who also based the dating on a small piece of text internal evidence. This evidence was disputed by E. G. Turner, who in turn expanded the period of composition to include the 4th c.; see Turner 1977: 181 (OT 187) and page 59 n. *. In short, the main text of the Minor Prophets could have been copied in the end of the 3rd c. The marginal additions, glosses and final, unidentified text, however, appear to be a later addition.",
                "selection_criteria": "Literary genre (Biblical),Literary genre (Theological),Nomina sacra",
                "absolute_relative_date": null,
                "stratigraphic_context": "",
                "shelf_mark": "",
                "bibliography": "",
                "external_links": [
                    {
                        "text": "TM 61966 \/ LDAB 3124",
                        "url": "https:\/\/www.trismegistos.org\/text\/61966"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": "DCLP (PN)",
                        "url": "https:\/\/papyri.info\/dclp\/61966"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": "Smithsonian \u2013 The Washington Codex of the Minor Prophets",
                        "url": "https:\/\/asia-archive.si.edu\/exhibition\/the-washington-codex-of-the-minor-prophets\/"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": "Washington Manuscript V \u2013 The Minor Prophets (Codex Washingtonensis)",
                        "url": "https:\/\/asia.si.edu\/object\/F1916.768\/ "
                    }
                ],
                "classes": "Textual",
                "writing_medium": "Codex",
                "text_content": "Literary",
                "language": "Greek,Coptic",
                "archive": "",
                "authors": [
                    {
                        "author": "Sofia Heim",
                        "year": "2021"
                    }
                ]
            }
        }
    ]
}