Get Social With Us

MAʿBAD HĪBIS (HIBIS)

Place names
Arabicمعبد هيبس
Site map
Site information
DEChriM ID3
Trismegistos GeoID2786
Pleiades ID776181
PAThs ID185
Ancient nameHibis
Modern nameMaʿbad Hībis
Latitude25.476681
Longitude30.555384
Date from350
Date to399
TypologyCity
Dating criteria

Coinage (Winlock 1941, 48-49 and Appendix 1, 51-55).

Description

The Hibis temple is situated in what was the administrative center of Oasis Magna in antiquity. The construction is understood to have commenced in 510BC, during the reign of Darius I, and was dedicated to Amūn (Winlock, 1941: 4). Winlock believes it was not the first temple dedicated to Amūn, however, with numerous sandstone blocks appearing to derive from another temple, including sections of sculpted scenes. This is in addition to the fact that the temple itself was built atop of another structure, which appears to have been razed to allow for the current temple’s construction. While the temple itself is a unique architectural example representing the transition from the architecture of the Theban Empire to that of the Ptolemaic period, our interest lies in the church which was erected against the portico of the temple sometime in the mid-fourth century, with the temple being decommissioned no later than the time of Constantine (Ghica, 2012: 195).


The church has a basilical plan, typical of fourth century ecclesiastical architecture of the oases. The entrance is on the north side, however, which is an exception among contemporary churches in Kharga, and appears to simply be the result of the installation of the church against the north side of the portico (Ghica, 2012: 197). A second door could have potentially been fitted in the south wall. A baptistery is situated in the northwest corner, and appears to have been a later addition (Winlock, 1941: 46). Steps lead up to the sanctuary, with the two top-most having sockets in them for the upright end posts of the wooden screen which veiled the altar within (Winlock, 1941: 46). The fourth century date is well-supported (Winlock 1941, 48-49 and Appendix 1, 51-55 for coinage), and relates to settlement areas surrounding the temple on the north, west and south sides, as well as occupation of ʿAyn al-Ṭurba.

Accompanying the architectural indicators of Christian presence, the temple is host to numerous Christian graffiti. See Evelyn-White and Oliver’s 1938 publication for comprehensive documentation of the inscriptions identified in and around the temple, namely pages 58 (#9), 57 (#30), 58 (#32 and #34) and 62 (#41).

Archaeological research

Many European travelers visited the temple and left graffiti as personal testimonies. This includes Cailliaud in 1818, Drovetti and Rosingana, Hoghton, and Hyde in 1819, Letorzec and Abouchanape in 1829, Muller in 1824, Ayme and Catherwood in 1832, Carrera in 1833, Mathieu in 1835, P. W. Guy in 1843, R. H. Borrowes in 1851, Schweinfurth in 1874 and the Rohlsche Expedition in 1874. The site was also visited by Wilkinson in 1825, Hoskins in 1832 and Brugsh in 1875, none of whom left graffiti (Winlock, 1941: 59-60). Despite the notoriety of the site, the archaeological work conducted has been of a limited scope. The Metropolitan Museum of Art (MMA) only excavated briefly, commencing in 1909 and finishing in 1913. This was accompanied by numerous visits in the following years focusing on copying the reliefs, drawing up plans and photographing the site. The MMA completely ceased all forms of fieldwork in 1939. ʿA.ʿA.Ḫ. ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz, former director of the SCA Copto-Islamic Inspectorate in Kharga, states that the Kharga inspectorate conducted restoration work on the temple in the 90s, uncovering artefacts attesting to Christian occupation in the houses to the south of the temple, but no further information is available.

Bibliography

Bagnall, R. S. 2001. “The Camp of Hibis.” In Essays and Texts in Honor of J. David Thomas, edited by T. Gagos and R. S. Bagnall, 3-9. Oakville: American Society of Papyrologists.
Bagnall, R. S. and G. Tallet. 2015. “Ostraka from Hibis in the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Archaeology of the City of Hibis.” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 196: 175-198.
Davies, N. 1953. The Temple of Hibis in El Khargeh Oasis III: The Decoration. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Evelyn White, H. G. and James H. Oliver. 1938. The Temple of Hibis in El Khargeh Oasis II: Greek Inscriptions. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Ghica, V. 2012. “Pour une histoire du christianisme dans le désert Occidental d’Égypte.” Journal des savants 2: 189-280.
Lythgoe, A. M. 1908. “The Egyptian Expedition.” The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin 3/5: 83-86.
Müller-Wiener, W. 1963. “Christliche Monumente im Gebiet von Hibis (El-Kharga).” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäoligischen Instituts Kairo 19: 121-140.
Newel, E. T. 1941. “Appendix 1: The Coins Found in the Excavation of the Temple.” In The Temple of Hibis in el Khargeh Oasis I: The Excavations, edited by H. E. Winlock, 51-5. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Osing, J. 1986. “Zu den Osiris-Räumen im Tempel von Hibis.” In Hommage à François Daumas, vol. 2, 511-16. Montpellier: Université Paul Valéry.
Parsons, P. J. 1971. “The Wells of Hibis.” Journal of Egyptian Antiquities 57: 165-80.
Schweinfurth, G. 1875. “Notizen zur Kenntniss der Oase El-Chargeh.” Mittheilungen aus Justus Perthes‘ Geographischer Anstalt 21: 384-393 and pl. 19.
Wagner, G. 1987. Les oasis d’Égypte à l’époque grecque, romaine et byzantine d’après les documents grecs: Recherches de papyrologie et d’épigraphie grecques. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.
Winlock, H. E. 1941. The Temple of Hibis in El Khargeh Oasis I: The Excavations. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Authors
Rhiannon Williams, Victor Ghica, 2020
Suggested citation
Rhiannon Williams, Victor Ghica, 2020, "Maʿbad Hībis", 4CARE database - Fourth-Century Christian Archaeological Record of Egypt, https://4care-skos.mf.no/places/3
Json data
External links
Maps
© V. Ghica, 2012, after Winlock, 1941
Gallery
3D models